What bums? Why the ones in Congress who back Obama Socialism (and of course that Head-Bum in the White House and his coterie of Socialist-Marxist Bums).
See, you don't have to endure whatever the government throws at you--it's threats from the Obummah-House, its instructions to inform on anti-Obama-"healthcare" blogs and e-mails or whatever.
You want the Obama-woman to call the tune?
Listen to what she had to say about us:
"Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual; uninvolved, uninformed."
Well, we are informed and involved!
. . . and
Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
What's that from?
Why "The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America"
And what does that mean?
Well, at this time, that we can still throw the bums out by voting them out.
That is, the Congress people--the incumbents--can be replaced by both parties in the primary elections, if they ignore the people they represent.
And . . . unless it is unlawfully interfered with, we have a presidential election in 2012.
Change isn't always a good change.
. . . and the Joker isn't always as funny as he thinks he is.
REVOLUTION FROM THE LEFT
Sara Robinson in her article When Change Is Not Enough: Seven Steps to Revolution [article written from a Leftist perspective] appears to believe so. Revolution, if it were to come, would come from the Liberals--led by such as Obama. Obama? Liberals? But aren't they for gun control? For "multiculturalism," the opening that our enemies, determined on taking over the United States for Islam, are using to subvert our laws and establish Islamic law--sharia--to replace the Constitution and make it irrelevant?
Any Revolution emanating from the Left--with a leadership such as Obama--Afrocentrically oriented, would be determined to turn the the society upside down--that is to let the bottom classes rise to the top and make what are now the upper classes subservient to them.
Yes, we have these types of Revolutions today, Hugo Chavez's in Venezuela was such a one. Not entirely bloodless, but nothing like a civil war and he has the country in the grip of a Socialist regime--just as Castro has done with Cuba.
The "disposessed" rise to the top--are in control--via a benevolent (to them) dictator.
A Revolution that emanates from the Left, would most likely end in a Socialist dictatorship that could easily slip into the grasp of the Islamics and end with these latter triumphant.
Richard Dawkins smeared as “racist” for preferring church bells to ‘allahu akbar’ - Slogan of the Week: “The word ‘racism’ is like ketchup. It can be put on practically anything — and demanding evidence makes you a ‘racist.’” Here’s an exa...