PUZZLED BY WHAT'S GOING ON IN WASHINGTON?

"Governments won't do the things you want them to do until there are enough people like you forcing them to do it openly."
Posted by: rudekid
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/014474.php#comments

THERE ARE TOO FEW IDEALISTS ON OUR SIDE

IN GOVERNMENT, MOST ARE IN IT FOR THE MONEY, AND THE CREATURE COMFORTS IT WILL BUY.

. . . men who have power through riches, intrigue, or office will administer the State at will, and ultimately to their private advantage.
--Admiral H. G. Rickover, U. S. Navy
"Thoughts on Man's Purpose in Life"
from:
http://www.limes68.blogspot.com/

The United States of today has nobody to save it from the consequences of appeasing the Moslems.
http://www.westerndefense.org/special/TwinTowers2001c.htm


The real problem facing the United States and Western democracy is not how the Moslems will respond to a policy hostile to their interests but whether the West still has the moral strength to adopt any policy causing its power-wielders temporary financial losses. Curbing their greed is a prerequisite for maintaining US superpower status and for success in the inevitable conflict with Islam. Will the ideals of democracy prove too weak to overcome cupidity?
http://www.westerndefense.org/special/TwinTowers2001c.htm


[Does] the West still has the moral strength to adopt any policy causing its power-wielders temporary financial losses?
http://www.westerndefense.org/special/TwinTowers2001c.htm

We need a campaign that ruthlessly inflicts the pain of war so intensely that the jihadists renounce their cause as hopeless and fear to take up arms against us.
http://theobjectivestandard.com/blog/2006/12/what-real-war-looks-like-by-elan.asp

The real problem facing the United States and Western democracy is not how the Moslems will respond to a policy hostile to their interests but whether the West still has the moral strength to adopt any policy causing its power-wielders temporary financial losses. Curbing their greed is a prerequisite for maintaining US superpower status and for success in the inevitable conflict with Islam. Will the ideals of democracy prove too weak to overcome cupidity?
http://www.westerndefense.org/special/TwinTowers2001c.htm

[Does] the West still has the moral strength to adopt any policy causing its power-wielders temporary financial losses?
http://www.westerndefense.org/special/TwinTowers2001c.htm
Repeated here on purpose

tgusa says:Don’t confuse kindness with stupidity. We as westerners try to get along. Now we have allowed an alien culture to infiltrate our world. They don’t want to live in it they want to destroy it. So what does that make these islamopoligists in the west? Traitorous rats who would not even stand up for our women and children. They aren’t selling me out, no one could do that, I’m not sellable. Can we really call these leaders Men? I don’t think so, at least not the image of Men that I have. Never include me and millions of others in that group, my ancestors fought against tyranny and won, mark my words we will do it again.Posted by: tgusa [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 30, 2006 03:01 PMhttp://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/014618.php

tgusa, your entire post hit home. While islamists are the real enemy they would not do squat had it not been for the sellout traitors in office. Can one imagine increasing students visa to saudi wahhabbis after 9/11? Yet that is exactly what dubya did. To borrow your phrase: Traitorous Rat!
Posted by: Alert at December 30, 2006 04:21 PMhttp://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/014618.php

Taken from
WHY YOUR GOVERNMENT WILL NOT STOP ISLAM